| |
|
At the recent 22nd American
Real Estate Society Annual Meeting held
during April 2006 in Florida, USA, DRE
staff and students were honored with 2
Best-Manuscript prizes.
The paper by Dr Kwame Addae-Dapaah, Prof
James Webb, Assoc Prof David Ho and Ms
Tan Yan Fen on “Industrial Real
Estate Investment: Does the Contrarian
Strategy Work?” won the best
manuscript prize in
the “Industrial” category. Using
industrial real estate investment return
data from 1985Q1 to 2005Q3 for US and
selected Asia-Pacific cities, their
paper uses the value-growth paradigm to
examine the relative superiority of
“value” and “growth” industrial real
estate investment. The results show that
“value” industrial property investment
outperformed “growth” industrial
property investment in all the holding
periods under consideration. Furthermore
the industrial property investments
exhibit return reversal. This implies
that the superiority of the contrarian
strategy is sustainable. The results of
stochastic dominance test validate the
relative superiority of “value” over
“growth” industrial property investment.
The paper therefore concludes that fund
managers who traditionally have been
favoring prime (i.e. growth) industrial
property investment may have to
reconsider their investment strategy if
they want to maximize their return.
Conferred the best-manuscript prize in
the “Valuation” category, the paper by
Assoc Prof Joseph Ooi and Mr Lee Sze
Teck on “Price Discovery between
Residential Land and Housing Markets”
examines the relationship between
residential land and house prices. It
tests 2 competing hypotheses on whether
high land prices in urban areas cause
high property prices or whether high
property prices lead to high land
prices. The former hypothesis is based
on the neoclassical theory of land rent,
whilst the latter is based on the
Ricardian rent theory. After
constructing a constant-quality price
index for urban land based on hedonic
methodology, a cointegration analysis is
then carried out between the urban land
price index and the residential property
price index. The evidence suggests that
the two series are cointegrated in the
long run. The empirical results modeled
in an error-correction framework
indicate that Granger causality runs
from the housing market to the land
market, which is consistent with the
Ricardian rent theory. The study did not
find any causality relationship from the
land market to the housing market, thus
suggesting that price movements in the
land market do not necessarily filter
down to high housing costs. |
| |